Politicians and the public question global climate change evidence, so scientists are looking to Hollywood and websites for a new voice. This is from an article on the Christian science monitor, published today.
Keeping the public looped in on what scientists are discovering has never been easy. For one thing, the traditional explainers – journalists – can distort, hype, or oversimplify the latest breakthroughs. But the need to communicate science broadly and clearly has never been more urgent. Understanding science helps people know “where the truth speakers are on an issue” such as climate change, says Robert Semper, the executive associate director of the Exploratorium, a hands-on science center in San Francisco. “The more educated and knowledgeable the public is about science ... the more responsible they can be when it comes time for voting or expressing opinions about public policy,” adds Leslie Fink, a public affairs specialist at the National Science Foundation in Washington.
I couldn’t agree more. The problem global warming alarmist are having however, is that when people start to educate themselves on this issue, they realize these people are full of shit. Think about it, talk to a skeptic and see what they know about man made climate change. Then, go talk to an alarmist and see what they know. The skeptic will have research from renowned scientists, examples of cherry picked data, evidence of tampering with data, computer predictions off by over 300%, cloud miscalculations, ocean current oversights, historical evidence of hotter and colder weather then we have ever experienced. They will be able to explain that co2 is only 3% of the atmosphere and a very weak Green house gas. They will know that human contributions to that 3% is less than 1%, making our contribution to atmospheric GHG’s almost minute. The skeptic will know the economic cost of cap-n-trade. The skeptic will know that the solutions proposed by alarmists, wouldn’t do anything to stop global warming even if it were a problem. Ask an alarmist about climate change and all you will here is: it’s real, there is a consensus, and republicans are to blame. The alarmist argues with nothing but the support of the television anchor, or local politician. They can never tell you anything about the science, because they have never done any research on it. They believe because the politicians and journalists that they like, tell them too. The skeptic however, not only has scientific evidence; but can point to nearly every alarmist and show that they are the people with the largest carbon footprints. They are the most responsible for the demise they predict. They hold festivals and conferences and summits. They travel all over the world to talk about this non-sense, when they could easily do it over the internet. They are the biggest “carbon criminals” that exist. Oh yeah, and they are making billions of dollars doing it.
Doesn’t it seem odd to you, that people who are convinced that the end is near, are doing nothing about there own impact on the planet. Don’t you find it a little strange that these same people are depending on government grants to push their research, or business ventures? Does it not raise your eyebrows to hear that Al gore is set to become the worlds first carbon billionaire, while lobbying the government to mandate people use his new business? A billionaire, for producing nothing. A billionaire created only by the governments forceful restriction on energy use. Think about that. Al Gore will become one of the richest people in the world by stopping others from providing goods and services, and increasing the price of everything. Does that not sound odd to anyone else. If these people were honestly worried that we’re heading down the road to death, don’t you think they would maybe try something other than changing their light bulbs in their 3 story mansions. Maybe a little less touring? Well, the problem is, they are much too important to do what they tell others to do. (didn’t you get that memo?) But have no fear, they have a plan-------- more public relations campaigns
The importance of getting the word out has science organizations scrambling to explore new channels, from souped up websites to asking Hollywood for help. The current climate-change furor has become the poster child for what happens when there’s a communications gap between scientists and the public. The vast majority of scientists see compelling evidence that the world’s climate is about to change significantly, and that the change is largely driven by human activity. Yet polls show public opinion becoming more skeptical about climate change.
The problem with this statement is that it brushed-over some pretty important details.
ALL scientists-- every single one-- KNOWS that the climate is not only about to change, but is constantly changing. There is no normal climate that we compare to our current. There is only what the climate is right now, and what it has been in the past. 5 billion years ago the planet was a massive yellow ball of iron. The Climate changes (even without people) and it become an oxygen rich blue planet. AMAZING!!!!! Increasing temperatures of 1 or 2 degrees since 1950 don’t mean Jack-squat, especially if it was 4 degrees warmer in 1935 then it was in 1950.
When did science become something decided by majority rule? While I doubt that there actually is a majority of scientist who believe this non-sense, I wouldn’t care if there was. There was a consensus that the world was flat. There was a consensus that the sun revolved around the earth. There was a consensus that the earth was the center of the universe. Einstein didn’t believe in quantum physics, but it still exists. The point is, consensus doesn’t mean anything other than theory. It is not a scientific law because they can’t back up any of their outrageous claims with evidence. Kind of a big problem when you think about it. Oh yeah, and most of those behind the so-called consensus, happen to rely heavily on government funding for their livelihood. They can claim all they want that skeptics are funded by big corporations, but the opposite is true. Skeptics raise their own money. Exxon did fund nearly $27 million to skeptics about 10 years ago, but has since stopped. Alarmist have received hundreds of billions from both public and private donors.. It’s no contest. Nearly everything the alarmist accuses the denier of doing, has been done to a far worse degree by the alarmist.
If you don’t understand how ridiculous this whole situation is, just look at the World Meteorological Organization’s latest temperature readings. Turns out that this last January, one of the coldest January’s we’ve had in nearly 10 years, was actually one of the hottest ever recorded in world history!! How is that possible when it was fricking freezing and snowing everyday? Well, well, well, it’s easy when you hand pick locations of temperature readings and disregard temperatures that aren’t hot enough. This type of cherry picking, combined with all the other things I have written about on climate science, has the public questioning the reality of this crisis. The alarmist community, in their last ditch efforts to save the gravy train, are now pleading with the public to believe. Not because they depend on it, or are emotionally invested in it, but because we need to………….….….”PROTECT SCIENCE”!!!
Yes, it seems that the exposure of all the errors and the blatant lying in the climate change community, has caused many alarmist to become sad that people aren’t taking them seriously anymore. Polls show overwhelmingly that Americans don’t care about this issue. Apparently people weren’t scared sufficiently by earlier predictions o death and destruction, even after experiencing the hottest January on Record. (LOL, I still can’t believe that)
The result has been a “corrosion” of public confidence in climate science, says Ralph Cicerone, president of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). That “damage,” he says, “has spilled over into other fields of science.”
PROTECT OUR MOTHER SCIENCE! Don’t you see? This issue is bigger than global warming. Its bigger than any of us. We need to accept climate change theory because if we don’t, our science will suffer.
Here’s the deal people, any problems with the publics confidence in the scientific community is the fault of environmental nut jobs, and scientist who are CONSTANTLY WRONG and/or lying. If your going to make end of the world claims, and suggest a complete dismantling of the worlds economy, you better have more evidence then…..none. If you want socialism world wide, you better have a reason with concrete support. These people have been predicting global warming since 1980. Before that, it was global cooling, and before that warming agin. It is all about money and ideology, not science. Any problem scientist have in swaying the public is their own fault for crying wolf for the past 100 years. There has never been a field of scientific study that was less scientific in practice then climate science. Climate science is nothing but a constant PR campaign, which is why this new push is almost amusing. These people live in an alternate reality where their mistakes don’t exist, and the flaws pointed out by others are the result of evil scheming corporations bent on killing humanity. The only thing that is going to fix climate science, is some scientific integrity. If they want the public trust back, then they need to stop being lapdogs for the government and the progressives. If they want people to listen to them, then they should start by telling the TRUTH! Until then, they are as important to me as the homeless guy on the street corner with his cardboard sign reading “the end is near
”. They are irrelevant, and it is their own fault.
No comments:
Post a Comment